Call us now 01473 688100

Facebook comments lead to fair dismissal

Posted on 7th October 2015
Case law

Dismissals involving social media, such as Facebook, do not attract any special rules.

On this page

Meet the author

Julie Temple Julie
Temple
Partner Telephone: 01473 694407

The test is whether an employer’s decision within a range of reasonable responses

British Waterways Board v Smith EAT 2015

The facts

Mr Smith had worked for British Waterways Board for 8 years. He was part of a team that maintained canals and reservoirs. Part of his role included being on standby, during which British Waterways required that he should not drink alcohol.

British Waterways had a social media policy which prohibited “any action on the internet which might embarrass or discredit British Waterways…”  Examples of gross misconduct included serious breaches of its policies.

Mr Smith raised a number of grievances, including against his supervisors and managers. In response, one manager disclosed to HR posts Mr Smith had made on Facebook, purportedly to show the issues Mr Smith complained about were not one-sided. The comments posted included Mr Smith calling his supervisor a “w*****”; his employers as “f******”; work as “s***”. He also posted “on standby tonight so only going to get half pissed lol”.

The manager had been aware of the posts for some two years and they had been discussed with HR previously but no action taken.

Mr Smith claimed his dismissal was unfair. The employment tribunal agreed, despite concluding that there had been a reasonable investigation and reasonable procedure followed.

The decision

The Employment Appeal Tribunal disagreed. It stated that social media cases did not need “special rules”. The test remains was an employer’s decision within a range of reasonable responses and British Waterways decision was:

1. The claimant admitted the comments but said it was “banter”.

2. The comments about the supervisors were highly offensive and inflammatory.

3. The comments about alcohol whilst on standby could result in a lack of confidence in the claimant.

4. The claimant’s comments were unacceptable and a breach of British Waterways’ policies.

In practice 


This case re-emphasises the need for employers to put in place clear parameters about what is and is not acceptable in the use of social media. The fact that the comments were made from a personal computer or that British Waterways were not directly identified other than by the use of the acronym “BW” did not matter. The passage of time and prior knowledge also, surprisingly, did not render the dismissal unfair.

Clear, concise and accurate information for employers and HR professionals

Visit the hrlegal archive

Find out how we can help you

Click here to contact us or phone us 01473 688100

Keep your legal costs down with

Professional telephone and email advice and guidance for solving your everyday employment law and HR issues

No waffle, well written employment law updates and HR news articles, including case reports, helping employers and people managers keep up to date with what's important

Our outstanding employment tribunal litigation service for employers designed to secure the best possible outcome for a value for money cost

Fixed-cost review and benchmarking against current legislation and best practice of your employment contracts and HR policies and procedures

Bespoke contracts of employment, policies and procedures that are legally robust, protect your organisation and comply with HR best practice

Related articles