The time they have taken to get to know us as an organisation has been invaluable and therefore their responsive advice is pragmatic and focused.
Rynda (UK) Ltd v Rhijnsburger | Court of Appeal | February 2015
Under TUPE, in order for there to be a service provision change (under regulation 3(3)(a)(i)) one of the conditions that must be established is that immediately before the service change there is an “organised grouping of employees” which had as its principal purpose the carrying out of the activities concerned on behalf of the client. The Court of Appeal in this case, in one of the few cases which it has had to look at the TUPE regulations, confirmed that a commercial property manager who worked exclusively on managing a group of Dutch properties for a client was an organised grouping of employees. This therefore resulted in a service provision change when the management of the client’s entire property portfolio was transferred to a new managing agent.
Although the claimant worked alone, she was effectively a one person department providing a dedicated service to the client in relation to its Dutch properties. The key reason why there was an organised grouping of employees was that the allocation of her work for the Dutch client was not left to chance or came about as a result of, in the words of the Court of Appeal’s decision, “happenstance”. Here, however, there had been a deliberate decision by the employer to allocate the client’s properties to the claimant. The employer did not assign anyone to assist the claimant and assigned no other work to her. It was on this basis that the employment tribunal judge was correct to conclude that the claimant was an organised group of employees to which TUPE regulation 3(3)(a)(i) applied.
The Court of Appeal gave examples of when an organised grouping of employees would not exist. Essentially this is when the carrying out work for a particular client results from “a matter of fortuity”. For an organised grouping of employees to take place there needs to have been an element of conscious organisation by the employer of his employees into a grouping – of the nature of the team – which has its principal purpose of carrying out the identified activities for the client. The Court of Appeal emphasised that the employer has got to organise its workforce (of one or more employees) into team with the principal purpose of carrying out the client’s work.
For the claimant the consequence of establishing a service provision change was that she was able to show that she had the necessary continuous period of employment in order to bring a claim of unfair dismissal, having been dismissed by the new managing agents.
At Quantrills we routinely assist employer clients with a wide range of TUPE related disputes, this Court of Appeal decision will be an important one not to ignore regardless of which side of the argument we need to win! Simon Quantrill or Julie Temple are always happy to receive TUPE related instructions.
Book a phone consultation
Apply for a FREE phone consultation with one of our employment law solicitors to discuss your case, how we can help and find out how much it is likely to cost.
Selected evening and weekend appointments available.
Tell us about your case
Our online form is the easy way to tell us about your case and employment details.
Short of time? Our ‘save and resume’ feature lets you save your answers and complete the form later.
Becoming our client is a straightforward process. However, before choosing Quantrills as your employment law solicitors you’ll want to be completely sure we are the right people to help you achieve your objectives. Having looked at our web site, if you like our approach and would like to discuss how we can help you, getting started is easy.
At Quantrills we are flexible in how we work with you and how we progress your case...
01473 688 100Or request a call back
By Online Form
Reasons to Choose
Attention to attention
Speed of response
Latest Employer Knowledge Bank Articles
Use our knowledge bank of employer focused briefing notes, checklists and case reports to obtain trusted and accurate information about key employment law and HR topics to help you learn more about your employment law rights.View more