Email Us 01473 688 100

Case Law

Was an employer’s decision to offer a disabled person reduced hours for a fixed period a failure to make a reasonable adjustment?

No, said the Employment Appeal Tribunal (EAT)! It was not necessary for the employer to guarantee that the period would be extended.

Secretary of State for Work & Pensions (Jobcentre Plus) v Mr Higgins | 2013

The facts

Mr H was employed at Jobcentre Plus (JCP) as an administrative officer.

Following a lengthy absence for a heart condition Mr H’s GP gave JCP a fit note stating he “may benefit from a phased return to work” on “altered hours” for a period of three months (around 12 weeks). Mr H later suggested a phased return over a period of 26 weeks. JCP proposed a plan of a phased return over 13 weeks. It did not include the possibility of extending the period.

Mr H refused the plan. He refused to return to work unless an extension of the 13 week period was agreed. JCP did not want to promise that there would be an extension and, as he refused to return to work, dismissed him.

Mr H brought claims for unfair dismissal and for failure to make a reasonable adjustment.

The decisions

The EAT overturned the decision of the employment tribunal. The EAT concluded that JCP had not failed to make a reasonable adjustment by refusing to provide, at the beginning of the period, for an extension of the 13 week period.

The EAT set out the process that it (and an employer) needed to follow when considering whether adjustments are reasonable:

  • the provision, criteria or practice (PCP) which Mr H complains about
  • the group of people Mr H compares himself to
  • the nature and extent of the disadvantage Mr H alleges he suffered
  • the adjustments that could be made to avoid the disadvantage

The PCP identified was the requirement for Mr H to work his contracted hours. Mr H was disadvantaged because he was unable to return (compared to his fellow workers) to his contracted hours straightaway. The EAT went on to say that ‘it was not self-evident’ the disadvantage that an agreed review at the start of the 13 week period was designed to avoid and concluded therefore it was not an adjustment that JCP had to make. The EAT said:

“If the employer grants … reduced hours which [Mr H] says he is capable of working, we do not see why it will generally also be necessary for [JCP] to give some explicit guarantee of future review. If, at the end of the period, [Mr H] continues to be under a substantial disadvantage, the duty to make an adjustment will still be applicable and can be judged in the circumstances at that time.”

In practice

This case emphasises that an employer’s duty to make reasonable adjustments is not a blanket one. Key questions for employers will be how the employee is disadvantaged and what steps can and are reasonable to take to alleviate that disadvantage.

Refusing to give a guaranteed review will not always be safe. It was not a breach of the duty to make adjustments here as it not alleviate any disadvantage suffered by Mr H, but this may not always be the case. At the very least employees should be reassured that phased returns to work will be reviewed regularly and decisions taken if and when circumstances change.

The duty to make reasonable adjustments can be difficult to navigate and it is easy to make the wrong decision. If you need advice and guidance about your duties to make reasonable adjustments, what adjustments you should make and consultation with employees our experienced team of employment law solicitors can help.

Book a phone consultation

Apply for a FREE phone consultation with one of our experienced employment law solicitors to discuss your case, how we can help and how much it is likely to cost.

Selected evening and weekend appointments available.

Simon Quantrill

How can we
help you?

01473 688100

Tell us about your case

Our online form is the easy way to tell us about your case and employment details.

Short of time? Our ‘save and resume’ features let you save your answers and complete the form later.

Reasons to Choose
Quantrills Solicitors

Trusted advice

Attention to attention

Speed of response

Pragmatic solutions

FREE Employer
Newsletter

Subscribe to our email based hrlegalnews to receive details of our Knowledge Bank & HR Updates updates and our forthcoming events.

Client Testimonials

View more

Becoming our client is a straightforward process. However, before choosing Quantrills as your employment law solicitors you’ll want to be completely sure we are the right people to help you achieve your objectives. Having looked at our web site, if you like our approach and would like to discuss how we can help you, getting started is easy.

Step 1

Get in Contact

Contact us and tell us a little about your problem and the help you are looking for.

Step 2

We’ll contact you

We’ll follow up with a free no obligation initial telephone call or email to discuss your case.

Step 3

Invitation to become our client

Provided we are happy we can help you, we’ll invite you to become our client.

Step 4

You instruct us

If you agree to our invitation, you simply have to confirm this is writing or by email and confirm your instructions.

Step 5

We’ll start to act for you

Congratulations! You are now a client of Quantrills and we’ll start work on your instructions.

At Quantrills we are flexible in how we work with you and how we progress your case...

In Person

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

Get Directions

By Telephone

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

01473 688 100

Or request a call back

By Online Form

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

View Forms

By Email

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

Email us