Email Us 01473 688 100

Case Law

Group disadvantage is required for indirect discrimination

A personal disadvantage alone is not necessarily enough to be successful in a claim for indirect discrimination as it may fail to establish that a provision, criterion or practice (PCP) is not objectively justified.

Trayhorn v The Secretary of State for Justice [EAT] | 2017

Individuals are protected from being directly and/or indirectly discriminated against in connection with a protected characteristic under the Equality Act 2010 (EqA). Under Article 9 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR), individuals are guaranteed “the right to freedom of thought, conscience and religion; this right includes freedom … to manifest his religion or belief, in worship, teaching, practice and observance.” This case, and the need for group disadvantage, explores the interplay between the two directives.

The Facts

Mr T was employed by the Secretary of State at HM Prison Littlehey as a gardener.

As a Pentecostal Christian and ordained minister, Mr T also volunteered for services in the prison chaplain. A complaint was made he had commented during a service in the chaplain that same sex marriage was “wrong” and he was told not to preach at any further services from April 2015, but he was permitted to lead singing.

In May 2014, during singing, Mr T “led to share” verses from the Bible, including Corinthians 6: 9-11 which says that “the unrighteous shall not inherit the Kingdom of God” and goes on to reference as the unrighteous various groups of people including “fornicators”, “adulterers” and “effeminate”. Further complaints were received and Mr T was no longer permitted to volunteer at services.

An investigation concluded that disciplinary action was warranted as Mr T had made homophobic comments. Mr T resigned and brought a claim for constructive dismissal, in addition to claims for direct and indirect religious discrimination. Mr T’s indirect discrimination claim was that the:

  • prison had applied a provision, criterion or practice (PCP), being its conduct and equality policy.
  • PCPs put or would put people of Mr T’s religion or belief at a particular disadvantage when compared to other people; specifically, people of the Christian faith, and especially Pentecostal denomination, were more likely to quote parts of the bible that offended these policies. This is often referred to as group disadvantage.
  • PCPs put Mr T at that disadvantage.
  • PCPs could not be justified as a proportionate means of achieving a legitimate aim.

The tribunal held that Mr T had not produced any evidence in support of either group or individual disadvantage and, in any event, they would have found that the policies pursued legitimate aims – the need to retain order and protect prisoners – and they were a proportionate means of achieving the aims. His claims for discrimination were, therefore, unsuccessful and Mr T appealed.

The EAT decision

One of the grounds of appeal was that the tribunal had erred in relying on the need for group disadvantage to establish indirect discrimination. Mr T argued that the right , provided for under Article 9 of the ECHR, did not require proof of group disadvantage.

The EAT referred to the earlier case of Mba v Mayor and Burgesses of the London Borough of Merton. The Mba case clearly held that it was not possible to ignore the need to establish group disadvantage and the EAT decided that the tribunal had been right to decide the case as it had.  In any event, the EAT noted that the claim had also failed because Mr T had not established his own personal disadvantage and concluded that the PCPs were objectively justified.

In Practice

This case reminds us that, at least for now, any claim successful claim for indirect discrimination must include group disadvantage, despite the potential incompatibility of that with Article 9 and should minimise claims where this does not exist where the claimant seeks to rely directly on Article 9.

Book a phone consultation

Apply for a FREE phone consultation with one of our employment law solicitors to discuss your case, how we can help and find out how much it is likely to cost.

Selected evening and weekend appointments available.

Simon Quantrill

How can we
help you?

Speak with me, or one of my employment law solicitor colleagues, on a no obligation basis, about your case and how we can help you.

01473 688100

Choose a phone consultation date & time Book a Phone
consultation
Request a call back Request
a Call Back
Complete our Tell Us About Your Case Form Case Details
Form

Tell us about your case

Our online form is the easy way to tell us about your case and employment details.

Short of time? Our ‘save and resume’ feature lets you save your answers and complete the form later.

Reasons to Choose
Quantrills Solicitors

Trusted advice

Attention to attention

Speed of response

Pragmatic solutions

Becoming our client is a straightforward process. However, before choosing Quantrills as your employment law solicitors you’ll want to be completely sure we are the right people to help you achieve your objectives. Having looked at our web site, if you like our approach and would like to discuss how we can help you, getting started is easy.

Step 1

Get in Contact

Contact us and tell us a little about your problem and the help you are looking for.

Step 2

We’ll contact you

We’ll follow up with a free no obligation initial telephone call or email to discuss your case.

Step 3

Invitation to become our client

Provided we are happy we can help you, we’ll invite you to become our client.

Step 4

You instruct us

If you agree to our invitation, you simply have to confirm this is writing or by email and confirm your instructions.

Step 5

We’ll start to act for you

Congratulations! You are now a client of Quantrills and we’ll start work on your instructions.

At Quantrills we are flexible in how we work with you and how we progress your case...

In Person

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

Get Directions

By Telephone

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

01473 688 100

Or request a call back

By Online Form

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

View Forms

By Email

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipisicing elit, sed do eiusmod tempor incididunt ut labore et dolore magna aliqua.

Email us

FREE Employer
Newsletter

Subscribe to our email based hrlegalnews to receive details of our Knowledge Bank & HR Updates updates and our forthcoming events.

Client Testimonials

View more